Moral question

This is an imaginary situation,
but I think it is fun to decide what one would do.
The situation: You are in the Middle East, and there is a huge
flood in progress. Many homes have been lost, water supplies compromised
and structures destroyed.
Let's say that you're a photographer and getting still photos for a
news service, traveling alone, looking for particularly poignant scenes.
You come across Osama Bin Laden who has been swept away by the floodwaters.
He is barely hanging on to a tree limb and is
about to go under. You can either put down your camera and save him, or take
a Pulitzer Prize winning photograph of him as he loses his grip on the limb.
So, here's the question and think carefully before you answer the question
below:

Which lens would you use?

Гы :)

Не смешно... :)

See Die Hard II :) . Richard Thornberg :) choose Pulitzer Prize :)

Amerikanskij umor blin...

S ihnei storoni eto smeshno. Da i vobshe Bin Laden on ved Chechnsiam pomogaet, tak nochemu eto ne smeshno s nashei storoni?

Вариант номер 3: спасти Бен Ладена и сдать его америкосам за $1 000 000 :-)