Какие кокпиты? Кроме схематичного прицела и схематичной цели там нет ничего, это ж Ёксель.
Какие кокпиты? Кроме схематичного прицела и схематичной цели там нет ничего, это ж Ёксель.
Арбайтен! Нихт перекурен!
Вот ответ автора на просьбу вставить реальные кокпиты (подчеркнуто мной):
the "cockpit screenshot" should be coherent with the gunsight reticle.
Moreover, some gunsight reticles were common to more than one aircraft. A further consideration: since there is the possibility to zoom in and out, the cockpit frames should "follow" the zoom level. Finally Excel is not so good for such kind of things. For each item (line, circles and so on, a x-y table has to be defined and filling areas with a certain colour is a problem). That's why I preferred to simplify the window.
The same considerations hold for targets: very simple representation for fuselage, tails and wings.
The very purpose of SC is to give an idea about the amount of deflection. By the way attacking aircraft trajectory different from a straight line isn't taken into account. Actual combat situations (turns, rolls, yaws etc) could affect the aiming point quite a bit. And this is even more true if the target too would turn, instead of following a constant speed, constant trajectory like the one assumed in SC.
Арбайтен! Нихт перекурен!