???
Математика на уровне МГУ

Показано с 1 по 11 из 11

Тема: feed back concerning comms in LOCKON

  1. #1
    Зашедший
    Регистрация
    13.01.2004
    Адрес
    United States
    Сообщений
    22

    feed back concerning comms in LOCKON

    I was just wondering if the devs of this sim have had a look at Janes F-18. They're comms structure and functionality is superb.

    It might be a good idea to take some ideas that they use and incorporate them into your next sim. I'm assuming you do intend to continue your superb business and make LOCKON2!



    But, the janes group knew air combat - especially from an American perspective - and weaved that into the comms structure of the sim:

    - You had an ability to query your flight as to how much ordnance they had remaining.

    - You could direct your flight in terms of flight, element and division.

    - There were more tactics that you could use.

    - You could station your element or division to perform a CAP where you designate.

    etc etc

    Quite a few commands.

    So many that I probably didn't even utilize them all.

    Another thing, the F4 flight sim is another star. You could look there and glean valuable lessons for the AI. There are good tactics there that would earn you much praise from the American market.

    Just something to think about.

    appeasement kills

  2. #2
    Одинокий Рейнджер Аватар для Foxbat (FOX)
    Регистрация
    28.02.2002
    Адрес
    Латвия, Рига
    Возраст
    38
    Сообщений
    1,534
    Yeah, radio communication's structure in Jane's F/A-18E was something great.

    Hey, AlphaWhiskey, do you know, is it possible to make F/A-18E work under the Win XP Pro?

    "Another thing, the F4 flight sim is another star"

    What's that? I haven't heard about the F4 flight sim! You mean, F-4 Phantom 2 sim???
    The sixties are over, man...

    All gave some. But some gave all...

  3. #3
    Старший Офицер Форума Аватар для RB
    Регистрация
    28.02.2002
    Адрес
    SoCal
    Сообщений
    10,899
    Originally posted by Foxbat (FOX)
    Yeah, radio communication's structure in Jane's F/A-18E was something great.

    Hey, AlphaWhiskey, do you know, is it possible to make F/A-18E work under the Win XP Pro?

    "Another thing, the F4 flight sim is another star"

    What's that? I haven't heard about the F4 flight sim! You mean, F-4 Phantom 2 sim???
    I think it's Falcon 4.0...
    Cooperate, Graduate, Retaliate (c) Flight Safety
    sdflyer.blogspot.com

  4. #4
    Зашедший
    Регистрация
    13.01.2004
    Адрес
    United States
    Сообщений
    22
    correct -- falcon4.0

    about XP - I would refer you along to SimHQs forum...

    here's a relevant thread:
    http://oldsite.simhq.com/cgi-bin/ult...32;t=007681;p=

    and a relevant quote:

    "I just reinstalled the program myself, I have WinXPHome (haven't installed pro yet, should, have it) PIV 2.8 HT, 1 gig of Ram, Ti 4600 Audigy.

    Game works fine with the Ti4600 so I know it's not that. I did have a problem getting the game to install, it took literally forever for the game to get past the installation screen other than that no problems. Drivers are 45.23 I believe, haven't updated the latest ones yet."

    Some people get it to work, some have trouble.
    appeasement kills

  5. #5
    Одинокий Рейнджер Аватар для Foxbat (FOX)
    Регистрация
    28.02.2002
    Адрес
    Латвия, Рига
    Возраст
    38
    Сообщений
    1,534
    Thanks, man! I'll try to make it work in nearest few days...

    PS: Oh, Falcon 4.0.... And I was hoping to fly the legendary Phantom, the legend of Vietnam War.......
    The sixties are over, man...

    All gave some. But some gave all...

  6. #6
    Bad Santa Аватар для Freddie
    Регистрация
    20.11.2000
    Адрес
    Москва
    Возраст
    58
    Сообщений
    3,460
    Originally posted by Foxbat (FOX)
    And I was hoping to fly the legendary Phantom, the legend of Vietnam War.......
    Get Strike Fighters: Project 1 then.

  7. #7
    Инструктор Аватар для NeverhoOd
    Регистрация
    17.08.2002
    Возраст
    44
    Сообщений
    1,398
    Foxbat (FOX), the legend is MiG15
    That kicks Phantom ass sometimes!
    I like F105

  8. #8
    Старший Офицер Форума Аватар для RB
    Регистрация
    28.02.2002
    Адрес
    SoCal
    Сообщений
    10,899
    Originally posted by NeverhoOd
    Foxbat (FOX), the legend is MiG15
    That kicks Phantom ass sometimes!
    I like F105
    I think it's MIG-17 not 15
    Cooperate, Graduate, Retaliate (c) Flight Safety
    sdflyer.blogspot.com

  9. #9
    Зашедший
    Регистрация
    15.01.2004
    Адрес
    France
    Возраст
    53
    Сообщений
    8
    Jane's FA/18 works perfectly with XP
    but you aboluetely need the 1.01F Patch

    And TSH patch for better immersion

  10. #10
    Одинокий Рейнджер Аватар для Foxbat (FOX)
    Регистрация
    28.02.2002
    Адрес
    Латвия, Рига
    Возраст
    38
    Сообщений
    1,534
    Originally posted by NeverhoOd
    Foxbat (FOX), the legend is MiG15
    That kicks Phantom ass sometimes!
    I like F105
    Yeah, yeah, I know that. But MiG-17 and MiG-21 . F-4 had worse maveuverability and critical G limits than MiGs. But it had medium range weapons, late USN and all USAF versions had guns. It had much better radar and avionics.... But air combat in Nam mostly was dogfighting. And in dogfight MiGs well and truly kicked F-4 asses. But these US guys, flying Phantoms, sometimes managed to win over MiGs....

    F-105 sucks. It wasn't a bad plane, but it had bad surviveability (живучесть, короче). And it's other characteristics weren't very high. That's why in (as I remember) 1970 it was completely replaced by F-4.
    The sixties are over, man...

    All gave some. But some gave all...

  11. #11
    Одинокий Рейнджер Аватар для Foxbat (FOX)
    Регистрация
    28.02.2002
    Адрес
    Латвия, Рига
    Возраст
    38
    Сообщений
    1,534
    Originally posted by Foxbat (FOX)
    Yeah, yeah, I know that. But it's realy MiG-17 and MiG-21 . F-4 had worse maveuverability and critical G limits than MiGs. But it had medium range weapons, late USN and all USAF versions had guns. It had much better radar and avionics.... But air combat in Nam mostly was dogfighting. And in dogfight MiGs well and truly kicked F-4 asses. But these US guys, flying Phantoms, sometimes managed to win over MiGs.... So Phantom is also a legend. As MiG-15 and Sabre are....

    F-105 sucks. It wasn't a bad plane, but it had bad surviveability (живучесть, короче). And it's other characteristics weren't very high. That's why in (as I remember) 1970 it was completely replaced by F-4.
    The sixties are over, man...

    All gave some. But some gave all...

Ваши права

  • Вы не можете создавать новые темы
  • Вы не можете отвечать в темах
  • Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
  • Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения
  •