Ми-28 vs AH-64D

[HAL9k]

Про нашу пушку и НАРы я там ничего не нашел, кстати страничку закрыли.
Кроме того, я не пойму, чего ты хаешь Ми -28 когда его только доводят до ума? Вот когда доведут тогда и можно будет покритиковать. А пока...

The official Swedish Army Aviation
Centre report on the evaluation stated
that the Mi-28's weapons accuracy
was "good and astonishingly
repeatable," particularly taking into
account the range of firing parameters
and poor weather conditions. Both
9M1154Shturmand 9M120 Ataka
guided missiles were fired against
stationary targets (to a maximum range
of 4680 m/15,354 ft, with the Mi-28
flying at 200 km/h, 124 mph IAS), with
1-m (3.3-ft) accuracy. Rockets were
found to be accurate up to a range of
4000m (13,123ft), with 35 hits
registered from 40 firings. Four
unexploded rockets were later found
and questions were raised about the
production quality and safety standards
of Russian ammunition. Gun firings
were unsuccessful due to bad
boresighting.

Тут и про пушку которая стреляла неудачно
и про синдром понедельника (4 ракеты из 40 отработанных просто не взорвались - во всем обвинили качество и стандарты безопасности российского оборудовния (боеприпасов)